Showing posts with label Vermont. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vermont. Show all posts

16 March 2020

State schools closed in response to COVID-19 pandemic

In response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Vermont Governor Phil Scott has directed that all state schools close no later than Wednesday, March 18. The schools will remain closed at least through April 6, according to a press release.

Update, March 26, 2020: The governor has directed schools in the state to remain closed for the rest of the 2019-2020 school year, according to a press release.

Scott called for local school districts to plan for the food and special needs services of children, for childcare requirements of healthcare workers and others essential to the state response to the crisis and for the continuation of student education during the dismissal period. This last priority is to include the assignment of trackable work for students to do at home and the creation of a remote learning plan in case the closure must continue past April 6.

The governor's March 15 announcement stated that no students in the state would be required to be in school on Monday or Tuesday, March 16-17, if their parents or guardians would prefer to keep them at home.

"The orderly dismissal of schools is essential to support both the state's response to COVID-19 and the needs of children and families in Vermont," the governor said. "We must ensure children are safe, nourished and still learning even as the traditional structure of the school is disrupted."

Rutland Northeast Supervisory Union, which oversees the schools of the Otter Valley Unified Union in Whiting, Sudbury, Leicester, Brandon, Pittsford and Goshen, responded to the governor's directive by notifying district parents in a March 15 letter signed by Superintendent Jeanne Collins.

The school district stated that its buildings would be closed to students after Tuesday, March 17. Teachers and paras have been assigned to spend the remainder of the week preparing assignments for students to complete at home.

The district is planning to deliver meals to any student/household requesting the service. It intends to deliver bagged breakfast/lunch to homes using buses. The buses may also be tasked with delivery of school lesson materials.

The Addison Central School District, including Middlebury schools, released a March 15 letter confirming that students would be dismissed at the end of the day Tuesday, March 17. The district pledged additional communication with parents on matters relating to continuing educational services and providing food and learning support.

COVID-19 in Vermont

The State of Vermont has a dozen COVID-19 cases, according to a March 16 report by the Seven Days newspaper. Three of the most recent four cases do not appear to be related to travel by the affected individuals. That indicates that "community transmission" from one person to another is occurring within the state.

The U.S. Centers for DIsease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that COVID-19 is a global pandemic. At last count, more than 6,500 people around the world have died from the virus. As of midday, March 16, there were at least 3,910 cases within the United States. Though the U.S. is still in the early stages of an outbreak, seventy Americans already have died. West Virginia is the only state without a reported case. (West Virginia's coloring in the CDC map below appears to be an error.)



According to a press release by Vermont Commissioner of Health Mark Levine, M.D., symptoms of a COVID-19 infection include fever, cough, fatigue and shortness of breath. Most people affected by the virus - classified as the SARS-CoV-2 virus - will have mild symptoms. About 15 to 20 percent of patients will experience severe illness. Older people and those with existing health problems, including lung disease, heart disease and diabetes, are particularly at risk.

Not a roll in sight.
(Middlebury Hannaford)
 Dr. Levine urged those who experience mild symptoms to remain home and contact their healthcare provider for guidance. Patients with more severe symptoms and patients who have mild symptoms but also belong to high-risk groups should contact a physician as quickly as possible.

The possible transmission of the virus from one person (who may or may not have symptoms) to another person has caused the cancellation of numerous gatherings and popular sporting events, as well as the closures of colleges (see Middlebury College article), schools, museums and other establishments. On Monday, March 16, Governor Scott issued an executive order banning large nonessential gatherings. Gatherings are limited to no more than fifty people or fifty percent of an establishment's occupancy, whichever is less. The states of New York, Connecticut and New Jersey also have banned groups of more than fifty people. Rhode Island has banned groups of more than twenty-five.

Around the country, retail stores are experiencing panic buying and hoarding of various food items and supplies. Stores in the Whiting area have bare shelves where hand sanitizer, cleaning products and toilet paper were formerly found. Certain food items, including pasta and some frozen items, are in short supply.

04 March 2020

Local, state Democrats back Sanders in primary

Eighty-five ballots were cast in the Town of Whiting, March 3, 2020, for the hotly contested Democratic Presidential Primary. The majority - forty-six votes (fifty-four percent) - went to Bernie Sanders, the U.S. senator from Vermont who is making his second run for President. Former Vice President Joseph Biden was supported by eighteen local votes (twenty-one percent).



Results are posted on the Vermont Secretary of State website.

Votes were also received by candidates Michael R. Bloomberg and Elizabeth Warren, as well as Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Andrew Yang, who had previously ended their campaigns.

The local percentage figures for the top two finishers were a close match for the statewide tallies. More than fifty percent of the 157,649 Vermont votes cast supported Sanders, while just under twenty-two percent backed Biden.



Statewide, Elizabeth Warren, U.S. senator in the neighboring state of Massachusetts, received twelve and a half percent, and Bloomberg received about nine percent.

Vermont voted along with thirteen other states and American Samoa in the "Super Tuesday" primary that, at this moment, appears to have given the Biden the lead in Democratic convention delegates over former frontrunner Sanders.

Town, state Republicans stand with President Trump

On the Republican side, no real challenger has emerged to take the nomination from incumbent President Donald Trump. Nearly eighty-seven percent of the 39,049 Vermonters casting ballots in the Republican Presidential Primary supported Trump. About ten percent backed former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld. Less than one percent voted for Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente.



The Town of Whiting had twenty-seven ballots cast in the Republican primary, with twenty-two (eighty-one percent) backing Trump, four (about fifteen percent) supporting Weld and one vote a write-in.

05 August 2016

Tuesday, Aug. 9, is Primary Election Day

Registered voters will be able to vote in state political party primaries on Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2016. Polls are scheduled to be open at the Town Hall from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m.

The primaries will decide party nominees for governor, lieutenant governor, U.S. senator, attorney general, state treasurer, high bailiff and other races around the state.

Sample ballots for all election districts are available online through the Vermont Secretary of State Office's "My Voter" Page.

19 May 2014

Stevens to retire from state legislature

State Representative Will C. Stevens today announced his retirement from the Vermont State Legislature. The retirement is effective upon the swearing in of his successor in January 2015.

Stevens, a resident of Shoreham, served the Addison-Rutland District, including the communities of Shoreham, Benson, Orwell and Whiting. He was the ranking member of the House Committee on Agriculture and Forest Products. Explaining his decision to retire, he mentioned a need to "recharge my batteries" and said he planned to spend more time with family, his farm business and other interests. Stevens was first elected in the fall of 2006 and was sworn in January 2007.

His announcement was made through an email to constituents. The text follows:

Dear Friend, Neighbor, and Constituent, 
    After eight years as your representative in Vermont's citizen Legislature, I have decided that it is time to return to being a citizen. 
    You have given me the opportunity to serve at (or near) the seat of power, which is something I've been thankful for since the day I was sworn in on January 3, 2007. My goal has always been to serve this district to the best of my abilities, and I hope I have honored the trust you have put in me. 
    I have enjoyed my time in Montpelier, and I am not stepping away out of dissatisfaction, anger, or boredom. I have gained insight into the legislative process, and I would like to think that I contributed some value along the way. I especially enjoyed hearing from you on particular issues, answering your questions, addressing your concerns, and running interference on your behalf with state bureaucracies when necessary. Perhaps at some point the time will be right for me to run for office again, but for now, I simply need to recharge my batteries! 
    It has been a real pleasure and privilege to serve as the Representative of the best district in the state of Vermont, and serving you has been one of the most fulfilling things I have ever done. I look forward to spending more time with Judy at home in Shoreham, giving renewed energy to our farm business, pursuing other interests, and carving out a little down time. 
    Although I will not be on the ballot this fall, I will continue to be your representative until a new one is sworn in next January 7th. This means that I will continue to be at your service until then, should you need help. As always, you can reach me by phone at home (897-7031), or by email (wstevens@leg.state.vt.us). Thank you very much. 
    Sincerely yours,
    Will

26 August 2013

Whiting Census of 1810

The 1810 U.S. Census listed a total of 565 residents in The Town of Whiting. The most numerous age-category - accounting for about one-third of the town population - was also the youngest. There were 93 males under age 10 and 95 females under age 10. Young adults were the second largest segment of the Whiting population. With 67 males and 66 females between the ages of 16 and 25, this group claimed 23.5% of residents. Older children, ages 10 through 15, were the smallest segment of the population, just 13%.

Children of all ages amounted to about 46.4% of Whiting's population. This figure remained fairly constant between 1800 and 1810. The percentage of older adults - there were 80 residents over the age of 45 - climbed a bit. It was 11% in 1800 and just over 14% ten years later.

The U.S. Census of 1800 showed a total of 404 residents in the town. So, Whiting had grown by 161 people, or almost 40%, through the decade of 1800-1810. The population had more than doubled (increasing by 127%) since the first U.S. Census in 1790.

The last two columns of the Whiting census were unused. They were designated for Non-White Free Persons and Slaves. Whiting had neither in 1810 (slavery was never permitted within Vermont). Its one non-white resident of the 1800 Census did not show up in the document 10 years later.

(See the related posts for the 1800 Census and the 1790 Census.)


27 May 2013

Green down here, but white in the mountains

Mother Nature dumped a good deal of snow on the higher elevations in Vermont and northern New York. Reports indicate that up to three feet of snow fell on some mountaintops. No snow fell here in Whiting, but we're able to see it in the distance.

Snow is visible on the tops of the distant Adirondack mountains in New York State.

24 April 2013

Whiting Census of 1800

I pieced together the few pages of the U.S. Census of 1800 that were related to Whiting. They are shown below.

The U.S. Census of 1790 showed about 247 residents in the Town of Whiting (I believe the official count was 249, but I could not find the other two people in the document). Over the following ten years, the population grew considerably. The 1800 Census shows a total of 404 residents in the town (roughly what the population is now). For comparison, in 1800 the neighboring Town of Leicester had a population of 522 (less than current population), while Cornwall had 1,163 (close to current) and Shoreham had 1,447 (more than current).

There were many youngsters in Whiting in 1800 - 77 boys under age ten (19% of the population), 58 girls under age ten (14.3%), 36 girls between ten and sixteen (8.9%) and 28 boys between ten and sixteen (6.9%). The total number of minors was 199, accounting for just under half of the total number of residents. There were relatively few older adults - just 22 men and 23 women aged forty-five and over. These comprised about 11% of the total population. Just one resident of the town was designated as not "white."

FYI - Whiting's age-group statistics looked very different for the 2000 U.S. Census (the most recent for which already-crunched numbers are available). At that time, children under 16 accounted for just 17.4% of the town population (somewhat lower than the state and national percentage), and adults 45 and older accounted for about 37% (about the same as the state figure but higher than the national figure). The largest age block was adults 25-44, with 31.6% of the population falling into that category (a bit higher than state and national figures).

The final column in the 1800 census contains no information for Whiting or for any other town in the State of Vermont. That column was used to track the number of slaves in each household. Slavery was always prohibited in Vermont.


27 December 2012

First 'real' snowstorm in nearly two years

What is being billed as Vermont's first "real snowstorm" in almost two years - dating back to a storm in March of 2011 - has already dropped about four inches of snow on the region and is expected to continue through tonight. Much of the state is predicted to have a foot or more of fresh snow as a result of the storm. The same is true for most of Maine and New Hampshire. Much of southern New England is forecast to escape larger amounts of snow.



09 November 2012

Whiting votes for Obama, Sanders, Welch

Official results of the Nov. 6 elections won't be posted by the secretary of state for another few days, but unofficial tallies show that 133 of Whiting's 188 voters (70.74%) supported the reelection of U.S. President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. That is a slightly higher percentage than the 67.21% that supported the Democratic ticket across the State of Vermont. Republican challengers Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan earned only 31% of the popular vote in Vermont and had only 54 supporters in the Town of Whiting.

Nationally, the Democratic Obama-Ryan ticket secured at least 61.2 million votes and 50% of the popular vote, while gathering at least 303 electoral votes. The Republican challengers earned 58.2 million votes, 48% of the popular vote and 206 electoral votes. Florida's official election results and the fate of its 29 electoral votes remain uncertain, but the Democats appear to have won a narrow victory there, raising their electoral margin to 332-206.

Governor Peter Shumlin
Whiting voters supported the reelections of Democrat Peter Welch to the U.S. Congress by more than 81% (Welch won his race with 72.23% of the statewide vote and 150 Whiting votes) and Independent Bernie Sanders to the U.S. Senate by 77.4% (Sanders won with 71.25% of the statewide vote and earned 144 votes in Whiting). Just over 56% of Whiting voters backed the reelection bids of Governor Peter Shumlin, a Democrat, and Lieutenant Governor Phil Scott, a Republican (Shumlin was returned to office with 58.1% of the statewide vote; Scott won with 56.8%).

William H. Sorrell, Democrat, won reelection to the position of Vermont attorney general. He secured just over 67% of the vote in Whiting. Also in the Nov. 6 elections, Democrat/Progressive Doug Hoffer was elected auditor (59% in Whiting, 51.5% statewide), Democrat Jim Condos was reelected secretary of state (89.8% in Whiting, 86.8% statewide) and appointed incumbent Democrat Beth Pearce won election as treasurer (51.6% in Whiting, 52.5% statewide).

Democrats Claire Ayer and Christopher Bray won seats in the State Senate representing Whiting and other Addison County towns. Independent Will Stevens was reelected to the Addison-Rutland seat in the State House of Representatives. He was running unopposed.

05 November 2012

Nor'easter expected Wednesday-Thursday

The weather should be fine for Election Day tomorrow, but a Nor-easter is expected to hit the Atlantic Coast shortly after the ballots are counted. According to NECN.com, the storm will bring gale-force wind and waves Wednesday night and into Thursday to the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut area that recently was devastated by Hurricane Sandy. Snow, sleet and rain are possible with the storm, and additional tidal flooding is anticipated.

Here in Vermont, according to WCAX, the storm could produce a wintry mix of precipitation overnight Wednesday to Thursday and a slushy snow on Thursday morning. The mountains, which already have been experiencing light snowfalls, should receive additional snow on Thursday afternoon, while the precipitation changes over to rain in the valleys. The weekend weather is expected to be dry and warmer.

29 October 2012

Hurricane Sandy updates

Update, Oct. 29, 2012, 5 p.m.
We have had on and off misty rain during the day and some shifting winds, but the damaging force of Hurricane Sandy has so far not been felt in the Whiting, Vermont, area. School was open as usual today, but all schools of the Rutland Northeast Supervisory Union, including Otter Valley Union High School, will be closed tomorrow.

How much of Middlebury's lingering fall foliage will survive tonight's heavy winds?
There have been a significant number of power outages in more southern Vermont locations, such as Bennington and Brattleboro. (Rutland and Montpelier area outages climbed as this report was initially posted). Winds are expected to pick up across the state later this afternoon and this evening, as Sandy makes landfall on the New Jersey coast, where already there has been significant flooding. Storm surges are expected to peak in the New York City area around 8 p.m.



Update, Oct. 29, 2012, 10:30 a.m.
Green Mountain Power is bringing utility crews in from Canada and six U.S. states to assist with repairing any power outages caused by this storm. The company's outage center reports just 247 power outages this morning, with more than half of those in Halifax, at the border with Massachusetts. (In the State of Connecticut, Connecticut Light & Power is reporting more than 8,300 outages already. Many of those are clustered along Long Island Sound and the Rhode Island border.)


The Vermont State Emergency Operations Center was opened at 7 a.m. Personnel are tracking the storm and preparing emergency responses.

The National Weather Service warns that 60-70 mph wind gusts are expected along the Green Mountains and in Vermont's Northwest Kingdom when Hurricane Sandy makes landfall later today. Gusts up to 60 mph could be experienced in the Champlain and St. Lawrence valleys. Peak winds are expected from the east between 4 p.m. today and 2 a.m. tomorrow. Downed trees and power lines are likely. Some minor structural damage to poorly constructed buildings is also expected. Rainfall amounts will generally be less than one inch, though mountain slopes could experience 1 to 2 inches of rain. No widespread flooding is expected.



Update, Oct. 29, 2012, 6 a.m.
The National Weather Service is anticipating that Hurricane Sandy winds will cause significant damage and result in prolonged power outages to the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern U.S. states. School has been canceled for millions of students along the East Coast today. Schools in southern Vermont also have announced cancellations.

Hurricane Sandy's maximum sustained winds have increased to 85 mph. The storm's center sits more than 200 miles east of the North Carolina-Virginia coast. Hurricane force winds extend outward 175 miles, and tropical storm force winds extend 485 miles. Sandy is moving northward at 14-15 mph and is expected to turn toward the northwest today and toward the west-northwest tonight, when she is expected to make landfall along the southern New Jersey coast.

Strong winds and rain are expected throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Storm surge could cause extensive flooding in ordinarily dry areas. Long Island Sound, Raritan Bay and New York Harbor could see water levels rise by six to eleven feet. Connecticut and Rhode Island sea coasts could see a storm surge of three to eight feet higher than normal. Two to three feet of heavy snow is expected to fall in the mountains of West Virginia, with a foot or more in higher elevation areas nearby.

In Vermont, the strongest winds are anticipated for the mountain slopes (see map), though the entire state could experience winds of 50 mph or more.



Update, Oct. 28, 2012, 6 p.m.
Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin has declared a state of emergency in advance of the arrival of Hurricane Sandy's winds and rain. He said he made the declaration in order that the state would have access to National Guard troops and federal emergency funds if needed.

The National Weather Service is warning that Sandy will bring life-threatening storm surge flooding to the Mid-Atlantic coast, including Long Island Sound and New York Harbor, coastal hurricane-force winds and heavy Appalachian snows. The service's 5 p.m. advisory indicates that Hurricane Sandy will be approaching the Mid-Atlantic coast by Monday night. It may be strengthened at that time through combination with a cold front moving in from the west.

Hurricane force winds extend outward up to 175 miles from the storm center. Tropical storm force winds extend 520 miles. Sandy is closely following the projected track for the storm. It is expected to make a left turn Monday night and make landfall somewhere on the New Jersey coast.

New York City may experience some of the worst storm conditions. City schools already have been closed for tomorrow. Dozens of schools are being used as evacuation centers. Some mandatory evacuations have been ordered for flood-prone areas of the city. Mass transit in the city is shutting down tonight until further notice.

It appears that Vermont will be spared the worst of the storm, but high winds could still cause damage and knock out electrical power for residents. Airlines across the Northeast have canceled flights. On Monday, Amtrak will halt service across the Eastern Seaboard, including Vermont service. The storm's effects will be felt most strongly Monday evening. However, showers related to Sandy's remnants are expected to linger until next weekend.



Update, Oct. 28, 2012, 12:45 p.m.
A National Weather Service High Wind Warning is in effect for all of Vermont from 2 p.m. Monday through 11 a.m. Tuesday. The strongest winds are expected Monday night from dusk until about midnight. Western mountain slopes will experience the highest gusts of 60-75 mph. Others will experience winds of 50 mph or more. Winds are expected to die down considerably during Tuesday. Residents are warned to plan ahead for possible power outages.

The National Weather Service has also issued a flood watch for portions of central and southern Vermont. Minor flooding of poor drainage areas is possible.

Numerous school districts in the State of Connecticut already have canceled school for Monday and Tuesday, anticipating flooding and damaging winds. Areas of Connecticut were repeatedly left without electrical power for weeks after two storms in late summer and fall last year.



Update, Oct. 28, 2012, 7 a.m.
Hurricane Sandy, now located more than 200 miles off the South Carolina coast, continues to move toward the northeast. She is expected to continue that course today and to turn abruptly to the northwest on Monday. Maximum sustained winds are now about 65-75 mph. Hurricane force winds extend outward as much as 100 miles and tropical storm winds as much as 500 miles. Winds will be felt in the mid-Atlantic states during the day and will become near hurricane force by Monday morning.

Current projections are focusing on landfall at the central New Jersey coast early Tuesday morning and a progression into central Pennsylvania. The storm, bringing dangerous winds, drenching rain and storm surge, is expected to weaken quickly after landfall, though storm effects will continue to be felt hundreds of miles away from its center. During Tuesday and into Wednesday, the remnants of Sandy are expected to turn back toward the northeast, causing continued rain and strong winds in New York and much of New England until it passes into eastern Canada by the end of the week.

A high wind watch is already in effect for all of Vermont. A flood watch is in effect through Wednesday morning for central and southern Vermont. Authorities do not expect much in the way of flooding from this storm, though some may occur in poor drainage areas. The state is expected to experience rain - occasionally heavy - and strong winds Monday into Tuesday. Winds will die down and the rest of the week's forecast calls for rain showers.



Update, Oct. 27, 2012
It appears that Vermont will be spared much of the wind and rain associated with Hurricane Sandy. However, high winds of 40 mph or more are expected for early next week and there will be considerable rainfall in some areas, particularly eastern facing mountain slopes. Power outages could accompany the high winds and some minor flooding is possible in poor drainage areas.

Sandy weakened just a bit overnight and was momentarily dropped down to tropical storm status. More recently, hurricane force winds were detected. The storm is growing considerably larger and is expected to grow further through combination with other weather systems in the region. The storm is tracking parallel to the southeastern U.S. coast but will turn dramatically left within two days, likely making landfall on the New Jersey coast Monday. A later left turn is still possible. That would cause Sandy to strike southern New England.

After landfall, Sandy may slow or halt as it combines with a large cold front from from the west. Any slowing in its movement will magnify the storm's effects on the region. Rain amounts of 3-6 inches are expected from coastal areas of Virginia to New York City, with 10+ inches possible in some areas. Heavy rains are expected as far inland as Pittsburgh and Buffalo. A foot or more of heavy wet snow is possible in the Appalachian mountain areas of West Virginia and Pennsylvania.



Update, Oct. 26, 2012
The computer models appear to be settling on a Sandy strike along the Northeast coast sometime late Monday. The New Jersey area seems to be the current focus. A merge with several other weather systems and the development of a Halloween "Frankenstorm" over the New York City region is feared.

Worst case seems to be a Sandy right-hook to New York City just as the storm stalls. That could deliver days of strong winds, intense rain and coastal flooding to the heavily populated region. Sandy is now a Category 1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 80 mph.



October 25, 2012
Hurricane Sandy, now a strong Category 2, is moving across Cuba at the moment. The storm has a well defined eye and includes maximum sustained winds of more than 100 mph. It is expected to track to the east of Florida into the Atlantic Ocean. Some forecast models show the storm doing an unusual counter-clockwise loop as it moves north and making landfall in the New York-New England area. The models are based on a trough of atmospheric pressure over the U.S., which could draw the hurricane inland in the Northeast late Monday or Tuesday.

Vermont's experience with Tropical Storm Irene illustrated the importance of communication through various levels of government and emergency services. Communication has been strengthened in the storm's aftermath and may get a test from Sandy.

Mark Bosma of Vermont Emergency Management recommends that state residents consider purchasing extra food, water and batteries - items that won't be wasted if the storm decides to remain out at sea. "We always encourage the public to be ready for anything," Bosma said.

25 October 2012

Preparing for a possible visit from Sandy

Vermont officials are keeping in close touch with weather forecasters and making initial preparations for what could be another encounter with a severe storm. Just over a year after Tropical Storm Irene caused tremendous flooding damage across the state, it appears that Hurricane Sandy has its sights set on New England. 

Sandy, now a strong Category 2 hurricane, is moving across Cuba at the moment. The storm has a well defined eye and includes maximum sustained winds of more than 100 mph. It is expected to track to the east of Florida into the Atlantic Ocean (The eastern coast of Florida is expected to experience tropical storm conditions). However, some forecast models show the storm doing an unusual counter-clockwise loop as it moves north and making landfall in the New York-New England area. The models are based on a trough of atmospheric pressure over the U.S., which could draw the hurricane inland in the Northeast late Monday or Tuesday.

Vermont's experience with Tropical Storm Irene illustrated the importance of communication through various levels of government and emergency services. Communication has been strengthened in the storm's aftermath and may get a test from Sandy.

Mark Bosma of Vermont Emergency Management recommends that state residents consider purchasing extra food, water and batteries - items that won't be wasted if the storm decides to remain out at sea. "We always encourage the public to be ready for anything," Bosma said.



(Update, Oct. 26, 2012: The computer models appear to be settling on a Sandy strike along the Northeast coast sometime late Monday. The New Jersey area seems to be the current focus. A merge with several other weather systems and the development of a Halloween "Frankenstorm" over the New York City region is feared. Worst case seems to be a Sandy right-hook to New York City just as the storm stalls. That could deliver days of strong winds, intense rain and coastal flooding to the heavily populated region. Sandy is now a Category 1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 80 mph.)



The  Oct. 25 "spaghetti" plots of Hurricane Sandy computer models generally predict a turn toward the Northeast U.S.

09 October 2012

Whiting census of 1790

While browsing through Ancestry.com, I stumbled upon Addison County's portion of the first census of the United States of America. Vermont had not yet been admitted to statehood at the time the Census of 1790 was compiled. The Whiting portion of that document is shown below.

According to the enumerator, there were 46 families and 249 individuals (I see only 247) residing in the town at that time. The census listing shows the name of each head of household. Figures in the columns represent the number of free white males over 16 residing in each household, the number of younger free white males residing there, the number of free white females, the number of other free persons, the number of slaves. The final column was not used anywhere in Vermont, as slavery was outlawed in the initial constitution of the independent Vermont republic in 1777.



29 September 2012

CT→VT: Our move, part 2


Some background
(Return to Part 1)

I spent my earliest years in the Bronx, New York. When I was about 11 and a half, we moved to Danbury, Connecticut. Moving from a fourth-floor apartment to a raised ranch on a half acre didn't cause much in the way of culture shock, as my grandparents for many years had a summer home nearby in New Fairfield. I was already somewhat acquainted with Connecticut and comfortable in the area. I appreciated many of the changes: waking up in the summer to the sound of birds singing, being able to ride my bike in relative safety on the streets, eating hickory nuts that had been dropped by a tree along our driveway, making "forts" out of branches in the small bit of woods that lined the backyard. Aside from one year, during which I lived in a tiny apartment just over the New York State line in Patterson, I spent the next thirty-seven of my forty-eight-plus years on Earth living in and mostly enjoying western Connecticut.

My wife Anna grew up in the Waterbury, Connecticut, area and went to college at the University of Connecticut. When we married in the autumn of 1991, we moved into a home - a pretty split-level ranch on a half acre on a dead end road - in the town of New Milford in southwestern Litchfield County. In terms of land area, New Milford is a very large town. But it was not very built up when we moved there.

It was not a wild frontier, by any means. There was plenty of shopping and a fair number of industrial and office buildings and a fine hospital. But there was also a great deal of open space. In our neighborhood, in the south of town just off Route 7, there were a number of unused and lightly wooded lots. Along commercially developed Route 7, there were vast stretches of woods and open fields. It wasn't entirely a country setting, but it was country enough for us.

Anna and I appreciate quiet and a degree of seclusion. We want our home to be a place where we can enjoy each other and our kids and our pets without intrusion. We like to see trees and fields and hills around us. And we generally dislike seeing other people's houselights. Our home was ideal for us. Large evergreen trees created walls along the back and one side of the property. Several trees and a large front yard shielded us from the road. One side neighbor was a bit close, but you could only see that house from garage windows that we kept curtained.

Even assuming a modest pace of development, we imagined we'd be comfortable in New Milford for a long time. Well, I guess it was a long time - more than twenty years.

Things change. And development doesn't always take a modest pace. The woods and fields along Route 7 gradually shrank and disappeared, replaced by large stores and restaurants and their parking lots. I recall years ago walking a number of times through a pretty field with large old trees which has since been flattened and asphalted over. We saw K-Mart come in. Big-Y took over a shopping center north of there. Then Walmart moved in to the south. K-Mart was replaced by Home Depot. Staples and T.J. Maxx opened a plaza and then developers began clearing and leveling an enormous stretch of open land across from Walmart.

By that time, we had fled the Route 7 corridor and scampered across town. We moved into a newer home in a very small subdivision with large, lightly wooded yards and many acres of thickly wooded sloping land across the street. We fought just a bit against encroaching civilization, bringing a horse and a bunny and six hens onto our new two-acre property with us. We composted manure, grew a few vegetables and ate a whole lot of eggs. Anna regularly rode her horse down dirt trails into the woods and over the streams across the street. Traffic hummed not far away, but we had an oasis of calm and quiet. For a while.

To be continued.

28 September 2012

CT→VT: Our move, part 1


'Why I went to the woods'
(well, not to "the woods," actually; it's more 
like farmland, though there are some woods nearby,
and a bit of swamp, too, but we don't live in that).

"I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close..."
- Henry David Thoreau.

Umm... Yeah, I suppose some of that applies to our situation. For example, I DO always shave close! I sort of also sympathize with Thoreau's philosophical objection to living "what was not life" - the set of rules imposed on individual existence by outside forces. And my wife and I do sincerely share Thoreau's desire for a simpler, more deliberate existence..., as long as all the essential elements - you know, Internet, cellphone signal, good TV reception - remain readily available. (By the way, Thoreau only mentioned much later on that his family home was just a couple of miles away from his "sturdy and Spartan-like" existence in "the woods." What a wuss!)

I'm sorry to report that is the extent of my agreement with Thoreau. You see, I'm not much of a marrow-sucker. By that, I mean that I'm not the kind of person who seeks out all the raw and exciting natural experiences. I'm sure there are plenty of those experiences in Vermont - I just read about a guy who shot and killed a 500-pound bear in his backyard down in Pownal - but that's not what I'm looking for. Despite my surname, I don't hunt. I don't mountain-climb or hike or go boating or even ski. I tend to avoid anything that looks in any way interesting. Boring is just fine for me. And it may be fair to say that our move from Connecticut to Vermont in the summer of 2012 was, at least in part, a quest for ultimate boredom.

I'll get into explaining some of that in Part 2, which will be posted as soon as I think of what to write and have the time to actually write it. I imagine what I've written so far is enough for an introductory Part 1. So that's all you get for now.